Sunday, September 27, 2015

Lulav before Shachris-- A Tadir Kodem Problem

I originally posted this in 2006.  I'm making minor changes and re-posting, because the original post only got one decent he'ara, and I think that you, and you know to whom I'm talking, can help expand the vort.

A friend called me to complain about Reb Moshe’s teshuva in Orach Chaim 4 99, where Reb Moshe says that he doesn’t approve of the minhag to make the bracha on the lulav in the sukkah before davening, because there is a todir, or if you prefer, tadir problem; davening is tadir vis a vis lulav. (Rav Shach says exactly the same thing, that in Kletzk the minhag was to make the bracha on the lulav before davening, but he didn’t do so because of the tadir problem.)

My friend's complaint was the following: The Pri Megadim in hilchos tefillin, in the Eshel Avraham, says that if you don’t want to wear your talis gadol walking to shul, but you do want to wear your tefillin, there is no tadir problem, because since you don’t want to put on the talis now, there is no question about which is todir, the talis or the tefillin. Now you want to put on the tefillin only, so talis is not in the cheshbon. The Pri Megadim shtells tzu the halacha of musaf and mincha in 286, that even if it is zman minchah, you daven musaf first. So, my friend asked, if you want to do the mitzva of lulav now, and you don’t want to daven shachris now, and you have a minyan kavu’a later to daven, according to the Pri Megadim there should be no tadir problem at all.

I told him that it is not a kashe, because the Pri Megadim is only talking about talis, which is not a chiyuv be’etzem. There is no chiyuv of tzitzis unless I want to wear the beged, and since I don’t want to wear the beged now, there is no chiyuv at all. But by shachris, it doesn’t matter if I want to daven now— it is the zman chiyuv of tefilla, so there is a din of todir whether I like it or not. And the din of tadir is mechayev that I cannot do a different, less tadir mitzva.

He then asked, if I were right, what is the Pri Megadim’s tzushtell to 286? There, of course, Mincha is a chiyuv, not a choice. We looked, and it came out that 286 is talking about a tzibur that was davening late on Yom Kipur, and they didn’t start musaf before the zman mincha came, that they should daven musaf first. But if you look carefully there, and at Reb Moshe’s teshuva in OC 4 68, you will see that the Rambam says that in such a case, the tzibur should daven musaf first only “shelo yit’u—” because doing Mincah first will confuse them. And Reb Moshe brings that the Rosh used to daven musaf while the tzibur was saying the yotzros of shachris, and later daven mincha with them. So you see that the Rosh holds that tadir is mechayev that you daven the tadir first, even if that means that you will be davenning musaf beyichidus. This is an exact tzushtell to the case of the lulav and shachris— that I cannot take the lulav before davenning, because tadir is mechayev that I daven first. And even though the tzibur has the minyan later, and I cannot daven now unless I daven beyichidus, it’s too bad. The din of tadir says that you cannot take the lulav first, or that you should daven shachris beyichidus and then take the lulav, or, of course, just wait till you daven shachris betzibur and then take the lulav.

So he then asked, if so, what does the Pri Megadim mean when he shtells tzu 286? It seems the 286 says farkert from him!

We realized, though, that it appears that in 286 there is a difference between Mincha Gedola and Mincha Ketana. There might be a chiluk that if it is the time of Minchah Gedolah, then it is better to daven musaf first, but if it is the time of Minchah Ketanah, then you should daven mincha first. If so, this is exactly the difference between other mitzvos and talis: Mincha Gedola is like a talis, because you may choose to daven Mincha Gedola if you like, but it is not the real time of chiyuv. Only then if you don’t plan to daven Mincha Gedola, you should daven musaf first, and that is the Pri Megadim's source for saying that you can wear your Tefillin before your Tallis. . But if it were a real chiyuv, namely Mincha Ketana, then tadir would say that you have to daven mincha first- at least theoretically, but in fact, of course, there's a shema yit’u problem.

The shaylah also comes up in Kiddush Levana— how can we do that if we have a chiyuv to say havdala? And it certainly is not a tadir versus m’kudash issue. Unless you say that you need people to say sholom aleichem to, which you won’t have if you wait until after havdala.

By the way, Rav Shternbuch says as a davar poshut not like Reb Moshe, but instead that if you do not intend to do a mitzvah now, even though it’s the zman, it doesn’t come into the cheshbon and you don’t have to worry about tadir.  It's too bad he didn't explain to Reb Moshe and Rav Shach why it's so pashut, because they, nebach, didn't understand it.

But I do have to mention that in the Keser Rosh, from Reb Chaim Volozhiner's talmid, printed in the Siddur HaGra before the Maaseh Rav, see #109 where he says that Reb Chaim did make the bracha on the Esrog in his Sukka before Davening.

The truth is, most likely this is not an argument about how to apply the rules of Tadir. It is pretty obvious that the precedence of Tadir only applies where the non-Tadir can be done equally well later. If you will lose something significant in the non-Tadir by the delay, you certainly should do it first.  So if making the bracha in a sukkah is significant, and you will not be able to make it in the sukkah after Shachris, you should do it in the sukkah before Shachris. Obviously, Reb Moshe and Rav Shach didn't think that making the bracha in a sukkah was significant.


NOTE:
Now that I've erased the original, I really ought to mention BlackLeibel's comment back in 2006.
The Todir Kodem problem aside, according to the Ar"i, the Chid"a and others, the Ikar of Netilas Lulav is in the Sukka and the appropriate time is after Tefilla, before Hallel. Compliance would necessitate either a mass exit from Shuhl to the Sukka before Hallel or Davening Shacharis in the Sukka. Instead, we (of noble Hungarian descent or, apparently, most Kletkers) Bentch Lulav in the Sukka before Davening. (See Pri Etz Chaim, Shaar 29, Ch.3 and Divrei Chaim, Drushei Sukkoth.)

7 comments:

  1. So I assume you say hosha'anos after musaf because musaf is certainly tadir relative to hosha'anos? Why is that not the reason brought down for doing so? (from Chaim. I am sure there is an easy answer to this that I should realize before writing.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The reason nusach A does it after Musaf is because the Tur in tarnat says to do it like that: the Bach says the reason is to do it like that because it's zecher l'mikdash, and in the Mikdash they did it after the korban musaf. Reb Moshe OC III 99 adds that as far as tadir of mussaf vis a vis the hakafos, it's not an issue because mussaf is a chiyuv and hakafos is not a chiyuv per se.
      Thanks for the he'ara.
      Also, we should remember the Shaagas Aryeh, that the idea of tadir only applies to chiyuv, not to reshus. I'm not sure how that plays out here, though.

      Delete
    2. I'm not sure it changes anything, but once you've said brachos, you are really down to a derabbanan of tefilah vs. lulav. Does a tadir derabbanan take precedence over a non-tadir d'oraysa?

      Assuming you can say kiddush before tekiyos, why would you not do so given that kiddush is certainly more tadir than tekiyas shofar? (Unless you use your sevara that it's not a chiyuv b'etzem because you could fast.)

      I thought the non-AR'I minhag is based on the fact that the na'anuim are a cheilik of the mitzvah, so you want to do your netilas lulav before hallel to include the na'anuim there in your bracha.

      I'm always afraid of writing at times like this (1.5 hours before Y"T) because the later and more rushed it gets, the greater the liklihood of my saying something completely nonsensical. Have I reached that point yet? (Chaim)

      Delete
  2. 2 thoughts -
    1) Rav Shach reportedly davened Schacris beyechidus because of todir on the one hand and al tifrosh on the other. That means that an al tifrosh that we would not even consider to be a prisha, i.e. bentshing lulav before hallel even though no one else is, was enough to be mechayev a shachris beyechidus.
    2) I always benshed lulav before davening in the sukkah, because I had been told that you can't have a cup of coffee before you do so. A couple years ago, after learning this Reb Moshe, I decided that the zman for lulav isn't until after shachris, so I can have coffee before davening and do like Reb Moshe. Then when I come home I shake lulav again in the sukkah, since the Ari holds the ikar netila is in the sukkah. Still not sure if it's a good cheshbon.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That story with Rav Shach is fascinating. It's a perfect maaseh Rav, encapsulating both halacha and hanhaga tova.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That story with Rav Shach is fascinating. It's a perfect maaseh Rav, encapsulating both halacha and hanhaga tova.

    ReplyDelete
  5. B"H, the many tirdos between Y"K and Succos render today the "rishon leCheshbon Bais Vaad". I believe that all the Tzedadim of this issue have been presented beautifully in this post so "Kol Hamosif Goreia". I just wonder why you didn't bring Tosfos in Brachos 28a who seems to be saying exactly like your maskana in paragraph d"h "We realized..." Gut Yor and Gut Moed to all! Yehuda O

    ReplyDelete